The list is updated monthly. The HPC maintains other resource lists on topics such as: aboriginal health; advocacy and policy development; board development; community development and community capacity building; evaluation methods; facilitation techniques; proposal and grant writing; social marketing; using research information for community health promotion and much more. Skip to main content Skip to secondary menu. Develop an evaluation plan An evaluation plan clearly identifies your stakeholders and their interest in an evaluation i.
Resources At a glance: The ten steps for conducting an evaluation Public Health Ontario This handout summarizes the ten-step process for developing an evaluation plan. Evaluation methods: An HPC resource list Health Promotion Clearinghouse, Nova Scotia Within this resource list you will find a variety of information from Canadian and international sources on the topic of evaluation. How effectively has the program been implemented?
How well is the program being maintained so that it continues to achieve its objectives? An evaluation framework based on the RE-AIM model might look something like the table on the following page. Framework component Sample broad evaluation questions Sample indicators Sample data sources Reach Who is using the service?
How often? What services are women accessing? Is the service targeting the needs of women in the local area? Are there eligibility criteria, if so what are they and are they appropriate? Number of women accessing service and comparison to expected local population need Demographic characteristics and comparison to local population Service records Local demographics Interviews with local women Effectiveness How effective is the service in supporting women to breastfeed?
Number of service users who continue to breastfeed at points in time Service records Survey of service users Adoption How is the service linked to other relevant services? How well do services collaborate or cross-refer? To what extent is the service fully embedded in the larger organisation? Number and type of collaborative agreements Evidence of cross-referral or collaboration Perceptions of stakeholders Organisational records Service documentation or clinical referral records Interviews with key stakeholders Implementation How was the service implemented?
What were the barriers or enablers in establishing the service? Documentation regarding implementation Perceptions of stakeholders Organisational records Interviews with key stakeholders Maintenance How is the service funded? How sustainable is the funding? How is the service governed?
What challenges face the service in meeting future community needs? It is also useful because it focuses not just on the intervention but on the organisational structures and processes which support the intervention. This is not an evaluation framework, but is a model for active monitoring and improvement over time. The CQI model was particularly popular in health services in the s and s, and is based on industrial processes for improving efficiency and effectiveness pioneered by a man named William Deming.
The CQI cycle is a very simple cycle of four steps, which when followed by a team over a period of time can lead to substantial improvements in working practices.
The four steps are: Plan; Do; Check; Act. The strength of this model is that it forms a continuous feedback loop so that people can be continually assessing and learning from what they do. This is illustrated in the diagram below. D Description: Title: Diagram of CQI cycle - Description: Diagram of Continuous Quality Improvement Cycle: Plan - defining the problem, designing methodologies and data collection processes, gaining ownership; Do - collection data, analysing data, monitoring processes; Check - taking time to reflect on what the findings are, what lessons can be learned, what changes might improve the current situation; Act - implementing improvements, maintaining high performance.
This process is particularly suited to involving a team in a collective self-improvement exercise. So, for instance a client survey can be used to identify ways of improving the service. This study involved an e-Leprosy framework being integrated into the real setting of a leprosy control program in Indonesia. The objectives of this implementation study were to integrate e-Leprosy into a leprosy control program at 27 PHCs in Pekalongan District.
Central Java Province, Indonesia to explore factors related the success or failure of such an implementation regarding the usability, involvement, and acceptance of e-Leprosy by PHC staff and to evaluate the effect of the implementation on leprosy patient attendance at PHCs. Method: This study used mixed methods implementation research with longitudinal analysis and involved two groups of participants: Leprosy Surveillance Officers LSOs , patients, and the relatives of patients.
This study involved four phases consisting of preparation, baseline assessment, intervention, and evaluation.
0コメント